Razer Mako X vs Mako: Specs and Price

Razer opened US orders for the compact Mako X desktop speakers on October 6, 2026, while the fuller Mako 2.1 set sits on the same storefront at a higher list price and is still waiting on stock.

Both models share the same basic idea: angled 2.75-inch full-range drivers, virtual 7.1 surround through Razer software, USB-C audio, Bluetooth 5.3, and a 3.5 mm jack. The split is about bass hardware, power, lighting style, and how much desk space you are willing to give up for a separate subwoofer.

Mako X vs Mako: the hardware split

Mako X is a 2.0 pair. Each satellite uses built-in passive radiators instead of a separate box, Razer rates output at up to 30W RMS and 45W peak, and low-end response is listed down to 60 Hz. Lighting is a 10-zone Chroma RGB underglow that washes the desk surface rather than the wall behind you.

Mako is the 2.1 sibling. It keeps the same 2.75-inch satellites and adds a dedicated forward-firing 3.5-inch subwoofer, with Razer quoting up to 45W RMS and 60W peak and bass reaching 45 Hz. Lighting flips to rear-projection Chroma so color hits the wall, which suits a battlestation pushed against a blank surface. Razer’s own FAQ frames the choice as fuller sound and rear RGB on Mako versus a smaller footprint and underglow on Mako X.

Power, ports, and desk fit

Both systems lean on USB-C for the main cable. On Mako X, that single link can carry audio plus up to 15W of power; unlocking the full 30W RMS rating needs a separate 45W-or-higher USB-C PD adapter on the secondary port, and Razer does not include that brick. Mako follows the same pattern for its higher output ceiling. Bluetooth 5.3 and 3.5 mm cover phones and older PCs, so you are not locked to a USB-C host.

If your desk is tight under the monitor arms, Mako X keeps everything in two rounded enclosures. If you already planned space for a compact sub and want deeper rated bass, Mako is the clearer match. Neither setup replaces a full PC speaker stack with a large woofer, and both still depend on Synapse for the full surround and Chroma toolkit.

Who should buy which

Buy Mako X now if you want speakers today, care more about a clean desktop than maximum bass, and already own a suitable USB-C PD charger. Wait for Mako if wall-wash lighting and a dedicated sub are the point of the upgrade and you can live with a notify-me listing. Readers who already follow portable party audio may also want our take on the PartyBox Ultimate 2 vs Ultimate split, which is a very different room-filling job than these desk monitors.

One practical limit stands out on both: without the extra PD adapter, you will not hear the RMS numbers Razer prints on the box. Factor that accessory into the total before calling either pair cheap desktop audio.

Bottom line and US pricing

On Razer’s US site, the Mako X is in stock at $99.99, while the Mako is listed at $149.99 with an out-of-stock notify option. Digital Trends reported a December window for the subwoofer model after the October 6 Mako X launch. For shoppers comparing the two, Razer Mako X is the available compact pick today; Mako is the reserved seat for deeper bass once inventory lands.